Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur

M/S Sony India Private Limited vs The Assistant Commissioner on 20 January, 2023

Author: Sameer Jain

Bench: Sameer Jain

       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

         S.B. Sales Tax Revision / Reference No. 79/2022

M/s Sony India Private Limited,
                                                                  ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
The Assistant Commissioner,
                                                                ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)         :    Mr. Alkesh Sharma with
                               Mr. Ayush Sharma
For Respondent(s)         :    Mr. Punit Singhvi with
                               Mr. Ayush Singh



              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

                                    Order

20/01/2023

           Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that identical

issue has been admitted in S.B. Sales Tax Revision/Reference

No.17/2022.

           Heard.

           Sales Tax Revision/Reference petition is admitted on

following questions of law:-
                "(ii) Whether under the facts and
                circumstances of the present case,
                Rajasthan Tax Board, Ajmer was justified
                in upholding the reassessment order
                passed by the respondent Assistant
                Commissioner under section 26 of the
                Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003
                which was passed merely on a change of
                opinion and there was no reason to believe
                that part of the assessment has escaped to
                tax?

                (iii) Whether under the facts and
                circumstances of the present case, the
                Rajasthan Tax Board, Ajmer was justified
                in holding that Memory Cards are not IT


                    (Downloaded on 25/01/2023 at 12:09:31 AM)
                                                                            (2 of 2)                    [STR-79/2022]


                                                  products covered under Entry No.10 of
                                                  Part A of Entry 65 of Schedule IV of the
                                                  Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003
                                                  which provides for levy of VAT at the rate
                                                  of 5 percent on "Prepared unrecorded
                                                  media for sound recording or similar
                                                  recording of other phenomena including
                                                  Compact Disc (CD) and Digital Versatile
                                                  Disc (DVD)"?

                                                  (iv) Whether under the facts and
                                                  circumstances of the present case, the
                                                  Rajasthan Tax Board, Ajmer was justified
                                                  in ignoring/overlooking the fact that
                                                  alternatively Memory Cards are IT products
                                                  covered under Entry No.3 of Part A of
                                                  Entry 65 of Schedule IV of the Rajasthan
                                                  Value Added Tax Act, 2003 which provides
                                                  for levy of VAT at the rate of 5 percent on
                                                  "Computer      system    and     peripherals,
                                                  computer      printers   excluding     multi-
                                                  functional devices & electronic diaries"?



                                             Learned counsel for the Revenue, Mr. Punit Singhvi,

                                   Adv., accepts notices on the behalf of the respondents. His name

                                   be shown in the cause list as learned counsel for the respondents.

List on 27.02.2023 along with S.B. Sales Tax Revision / Reference No.115/2020.

(SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/25 (Downloaded on 25/01/2023 at 12:09:31 AM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)