Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

6. On other hand, Smt.Manasi Kumar, appearing for respondent no.1 - National Commission for Indian System of Medicine (NCISM) and Smt.Mamata Kulkarni, learned counsel appearing for Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (RGUHS) sought to oppose writ petition. It was submitted that relief sought for by petitioner was misconceived. It was submitted that Examination for PG Course in Ayurveda were conducted in pursuance of Regulations of Indian Medicine Central Council (Post-Graduate Ayurveda Education) Regulations 2016, Regulation 9(6) of which provided for maximum duration for completion of Course was not to exceed period of 6 years from date of admission and Regulations 12(1) and 14 were regarding mode of examination and appointment of Examiners. It was submitted that evaluation of preliminary examination was to be conducted by a team of two examiners, out of which one examiner shall be external from any other NC: 2024:KHC:4055 institution and final examination shall be conducted by a team of four examiners, out of which two examiners shall be external. Insofar as computation of results, regulations framed by RGHUS namely, Ordinance Governing Post-Graduation Including Diploma and Super-Speciality Answer Scripts Evaluation notified on 29.03.2019 in Regulation- 4 -provided that all answer scripts of Post Graduate Courses were to be digitally evaluated and average total marks awarded by four evaluators was to be considered for computation of results.