Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: GHATAL in Abdus Sattar @ Abdus Sattar Mondal @ ... vs The State Of West Bengal on 20 February, 2020Matching Fragments
1. The present revisional application has been preferred questioning the legality of the order dated 13.02.2020 passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ghatal, Paschim Medinipur in connection with Criminal Misc. Case No. 199/2019 arising out of Chandrakona P.S. Case No. 201/2012 dated 25.09.2012 under Sections 465/467/474/408/409/420 of the Indian Penal Code wherein the learned Sessions Court was pleased to cancel the bail of the petitioner under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(iii) The present petitioner again preferred an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the learned Sessions Judge, Paschim Medinipur vide Cr. Misc. Case No. 3682/2014 and the same was considered and rejected by the learned Sessions Judge on 13.11.2014.
(iv) The petitioner pursuant to the charge-sheet being filed on 20.08.2015 before the learned A.C.J.M., Ghatal preferred an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Hon'ble High Court, Calcutta being C.R.M. No. 11340 of 2015 and by an order dated 20.01.2016, the Hon'ble High Court was pleased to dismiss the application for anticipatory bail.
We, however, observe that, in event, petitioner surrenders within four weeks and apply for regular bail, the same shall be considered expeditiously."
(vi) On 22.07.2019, the petitioner filed a put up petition for presenting the records before the learned A.C.J.M., Ghatal, surrendered and on the same day was granted bail.
3. There is another part of the case which reflects that the investigation was initiated in the year 2012 and charge-sheet was submitted in the year 2015 (20.08.2015) under Sections 465/467/477(A)/408/409/420 of the Indian Penal Code.
13. In view of the reasons so assigned by the learned Sessions Court and the irrelevant consideration and omission of material circumstances by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghatal, I am not inclined to interfere with the order dated 13.02.2020 passed in Criminal Misc. Case No. 199 of 2019 by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ghatal, Paschim Medinipur. As such, the order dated 13.02.2020 passed in Criminal Misc. Case No. 199 of 2019 by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ghatal, Paschim Medinipur is hereby affirmed. Accordingly, C.R.R. 604 of 2020 is dismissed.