Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: data processing assistant in Umed vs State Of Haryana on 29 August, 2018Matching Fragments
With that the prosecution evidence got concluded. Statement of the accused was recorded under Section 313 Cr.P.C., in which all the incriminating circumstances appearing against such accused were put to him, but he denied the allegations contending that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case.
In defence evidence accused examined Rahul Saini, Data Processing, Assistant, Office of Chief Medical Officer, Narnaul as DW1.
After hearing arguments, learned trial Court convicted and sentenced accused Umed as mentioned above, which left him aggrieved and he has filed the present appeal.