Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: engineering services in Satyadeo Mohan Ghosh vs The State Of Jharkhand Through The Chief ... on 17 April, 2026Matching Fragments
6.Jharkhand Engineering Services Association (JSEA) though its General Secretary Bibhuti Narayan Singh, S/o Baban Singh, R/o- Vidhya Singh Nawag Colony, Kadru, Harmu,, Dist- Ranchi.
7.Ashish Kumar Sinha, S/o Sri Dinesh Kumar Sinha, R/o Vill_Flat No. 4096, Maha Laxmi Palace, New Sahjanand Chowk, P.O. & PS Harmu, Dist-Ranchi .
8. The Secretary, Jharkhand Public Service Commission (JPSC), having its office at Circular Road, Deputy Para, Ahirtoli, P.O &P.S. - Lalpur, Ranchi, Jharkhand.
... ... Respondents with Diploma Engineers Association, Jharkhand having its Registration No. 755 dated 16/12/2008, Office at PWD Campus, Jhanda Chowk, PO & PS: Doranda, District- Ranchi- 834 002, through its General Secretary, Shekhar Kumar, son of Late Shiv Govind Prasad, resident of Gandhi Vihar, Lane No. 1, PO & PS Bariatu, District- Ranchi.
Mrs. Darshana Poddar Mishra, learned A.A.G.-I submits that although she has oral instructions but she has to bring the same on affidavits. She, therefore, seeks three weeks‟ time to file a reply to these Interlocutory Applications.
Mr. Krishna Murari, learned counsel for the Intervenor (Jharkhand Engineering Services Association) has submitted that a copy of the Interlocutory Applications have not been served upon him.
Mr. Jitendra Singh, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners submits with objection that the copies shall be served upon Mr. Krishna Murari, learned counsel for the Intervenor (Jharkhand Engineering Services Association).
The said exercise should be done by 5th August, 2024.
Let this matter be listed on 18th September, 2024 under the heading "For Orders" for consideration of the Interlocutory Applications as well as the preliminary objection raised by Mr. Krishna Murari, learned counsel for Page | 26 2026:JHHC:11185-DB the Intervenor (Jharkhand Engineering Services Association)."
146. Thus, it is evident that since there is no such provision in Rule-8 of Bihar Engineering Services Class I Rules, 1939, which prescribes only qualification i.e. Degree or diploma in Engineering from an Indian Engineering College either by direct appointment or for appointment by way of promotion, the judgment of A.S. Pramar is totally non applicable in the present case and therefore does not supersedes the Division Bench Judgment of the Hon'ble Patna High Court in S.K. Md. Amir Ansari Vs. State of Bihar (supra).