Skip to main content
Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
Sunland Metal Recycling Industries and Ors Vs. CCE, Vapi -2016(2)
TMI -534 -CESTAT -AHMEDABAD.
CCE Vs. Garg Industries Pvt. Ltd. and ors -2023(3)TMI 637 CESTAT
AHD
Sainath Industries Vs. CCE- 2023 (9) TMI -1189-CESTAT-Ahmedabd
3.3 He also submits that there is no evidence in support of the assertion
that payments made by the Respondent by Cheque/RTGS to the Ship
Breaking Units for the purchase of Ship- Breaking Scarp were returned by
the Ship-breaking units in cash through angadias. During the search of the
respondent's premises there is no seizure of any cash. There is no statement
of any angadia about payment being returned to the Respondent through
such angadia. The show cause notice has been relied upon the loose papers
contain hand-written figures which are said to be written by Mr. Parvat
Mallik, Accountant of M/s Vishal Engineering, who in his statement stated
that the figures so written represent receipts and payment in cash during
the period 10.03.2010 to 27.03.2010 . Based on such loose hand -written
rough records pertaining to a period of 17 days the show cause notice has
alleged that during the entire period from August 2007 to March 2010, the
payment made by cheque/RTGS by the Respondent to the Ship-Breaking
units were received back in cash by the respondent through angadias.