Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
16.DW7 is Kuldeep himself who deposed that there was a love affair be tween himself and complainant Neelam and as such being residents of the same locality, both the family members were on visiting terms with each other. He further deposed that there used to be telephonic conversation between them and as such he came to know that her parents had beaten her up on the pretext of their relationship and he further clarified that he never given tuitions to her brother. He also further clarified that he never wrote on the walls of the house of com plainant asserting that those writings on the walls were not in his handwriting. He further deposed that uncle of complainant alongwith another person had come to his house on 22.05.2011 and had beaten him with a hockey stick for which a call was made to the police by him but his complaint was not registered rather Neelam lodged a complaint him under the pressure of her parents. He further deposed that he never committed any act as alleged by the complainant as he never wanted to defame her. He also deposed that he had visited sev eral places in Delhi alongwith her and also clicked photographs with FIR No.178/11 (P.S. Sunlight Colony) State Vs Kuldeep Page 10 of 15 pages her. She often used to sent SMS to him at his mobile. He placed those photographs on record which are Ex.DW7/DA to Ex.DW7/DC and has also placed on record the transcript CD of SMS of conversation be tween them as Ex.DW7/DD. In cross examination by Ld. APP he ad mitted that he used to visit the house of complainant and as such any incident alleged by the complainant never took place. He further stat ed that he never spoke with complainant subsequent to May 2011 and as such that was the reason that he could not tell as to who af fixed the posters on the wall of the complainant. He also admitted that he wanted to marry the complainant and that she also wanted to marry with him. He further admitted that he came to know about par ents of complainant searching for a groom for her. He declined the suggestion that he wanted to defame the complainant by pasting such posters so as to stop her parents from marrying complainant with an other person. Defence Evidence was closed vide separate statement of the accused.