Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

12. But, in this case, the deceased were travelling in the tractor. Whereas, the respondent vehemently contended that in the decision reported in 2019 ACJ 840 (C.Pinniammal ..vs.. http://www.judis.nic.in Jakkammal and others), this Hon'ble Court held that travelling in the mudguard of the tractor is violation of policy conditions and therefore, the Tribunal rightly held that the tractor cannot be termed as a goods vehicle and it is only meant for agricultural works and for the persons, who travelled on the tractor, no compensation can be granted and the said finding is according to law.