Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

06. The petitioner also refers to a letter dated 15 th October, 2009. Thus, these were all reminders to the petitioner. The petitioner responded to the same by addressing a letter dated 28 th October, 2010 and giving the information as demanded. The petitioner placed on record two points for consideration of the authority, namely that the petitioner is a educational public Trust and hence, service tax was not leviable on its activities, at least in 2010. This point was previously discussed with the officers of the second respondent while forwarding the documents. The petitioner then invites the attention of this court to Annexure 'F' to this petition, which, according to the petitioner, seeks to bring into focus the amendments and effected to the Act. By this communication, copy of which is at page 118 of the paper book, the petitioner was reminded that as far as the unsigned statements/data submitted, it is not clear whether all amounts pertaining to commercial training or coaching have been considered. The data needs to be submitted only after it has been signed by a responsible person. There has to be a complete reconciliation with the figures reflecting in the balance-sheet. The petitioner was directed to convey the name and designation of a responsible person whose statement can be recorded under J.V.Salunke,PA 906-WP.4235.2011.doc section 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 as made applicable to service tax under section 83 of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994.