Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

(22) PW28 Kanhayya Lal has deposed that earlier he was residing in the house of Ved Singh in the same area and in the year 2011 he was working as labour in a cable factory. According to him, deceased Buddhi Lal was his brother in law (Jija) who was residing in Delhi in Jhuggi no. 388, Sanjay Camp Haiderpur with Hanuman. He has testified that on 05.04.2011 Babloo informed him on mobile phone that Buddhi Lal was not traceable as he had not returned to his residence after which they made a phone call to Madan Lal who informed them that Buddhi Lal came to his factory on 30.03.2011 and went away from there in the evening time after completing his work and thereafter he had not come to the factory for work. The witness has further deposed that on 05.04.2011 in the evening time he along with Babloo reached at Sanjay Camp where Hanuman was present and the females of the area told them that police persons were pasting the photographs of a deceased person on which they went to Police Station Shalimar Bagh and saw the poster outside the police station Shalimar Bagh containing the photograph of the deceased Buddhi Lal. According to him, on the next day he identified the dead body Buddhi Lal at BJRM Hospital Mortuary, Delhi and his statement was recorded by the police in this respect which is Ex.PW28/A. This witness was not cross examined by Ld. Defence Counsels despite opportunity and hence his testimony has gone uncontroverted.

(33) PW31 Sh. Ganesh Goswami has deposed that he is residing in Mukundpur, Part­I and running a security agency under the name and style of Rock Security and used to provide security guards to residential colony, Industrial Areas etc. on contract basis. According to the witness, he had provided four guards at C&D Block Shalimar Bagh of whom Farakat Ali and Amit Giri were posted at Gate No.3 and were on round between gate no.3 and 4 on 30.03.2011. He has testified that a register is being maintained at Gate no.1 with regard to the attendance of the guards which register belong to their agency. He has also deposed that he had given his SIM whose number he does not recollect to Amit Giri for official use which SIM he had obtained from Zahid Telecome on his address and it was the same SIM by which the call was made at 100 by Amit Giri. He had brought the Duty register of his office with regard to the duties of Amit Giri and Farakat Ali on 30.03.2011 at night time at gate no.3, C&D Block, Shalimar Bagh, the relevant entry in register is Ex.PW31/A. In reply to a leading question asked by Ld. Addl. PP for the State the witness has admitted that the SIM which was given by him to Amit Giri was bearing no. 9910378590. This witness was not cross examined by Ld. Defence counsel despite opportunity given and hence his testimony has gone uncontroverted.

(59) PW5 HC Pawan Kumar is a formal witness being the DD Writer who has been examined by way of affidavit which is Ex.PW5/1 wherein he has proved having lodged the DD No. 32­A copy of which is Ex.PW5/A. He has not been cross­examined by the Ld. Defence counsels and his testimony has gone uncontroverted.
(60) PW6 HC Pramod is a formal witness being the Duty Officer of Police Station Samaypur Badli who has been examined by way of affidavit which is Ex.PW6/1 wherein he has proved having registered the FIR No. 14/11, under Sections 394/397/34 IPC of Police Station S.P. Badli on the basis of rukka which is Ex.PW6/A and after registering the FIR, the investigation of the case was entrusted to ASI Harender Singh. This witness has not been cross­examined on behalf of the accused despite opportunity given and the entire testimony has gone uncontroverted.
(61) PW7 Ct. Bhupender is a formal witness being the DD Writer who has been examined by way of affidavit which is Ex.PW7/1 wherein he has proved having lodged the DD No. 7B dated 2.4.2011 regarding death of an unknown person who had been admitted in Trauma Centre on 30.3.11 copy of which DD is Ex.PW7/A. This witness has not been cross­examined on behalf of the accused despite opportunity given and the entire testimony has gone uncontroverted.
(62) PW8 Ct. Monu Yadav is a formal witness being the Duty Officer who has been examined by way of affidavit which is Ex.PW8/1 wherein he has proved having lodged DD No.73B dated 30.3.2011 copy of which is Ex.PW8/A. This witness has not been cross­examined on behalf of the accused despite opportunity given and the entire testimony has gone uncontroverted.