Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

(14) It is well settled that an executing court cannot go behind a decree or an order which is to be executed. It can, however, construe a decree or order. Such construction has, however, to be confined to the face of the record. In Abdul Rehman, , the jurisdiction of the court of small causes was confined under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947 to proceedings between a landlord and a tenant in respect of the premises. Opsn land used for agricultural purposes was not included in such premises. Nevertheless, an order for ejectment in respect of such land was passed by the Court of Small Causes. When the landlord, applied for the execution of the decree for ejectment, the judgment-debtor raised the objection that the Court of Small Causes had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit and the decree for ejectment on that account was a nullity. In that case also such an objection had not been raised before the Court of Small Causes when it passed the decree for ejectment. The considerations which should govern an executing court in considering such an objection were laid down by the Supreme Court in paragraph 6 of the judgment in the following words :- "ACourt executing a decree cannot go behind the decree between the parties or their representatives; it must take the decree according to its tenor, and cannot entertain any objection that the decree was incorrect in law or on facts. Until it is set aside by an appropriate proceeding in appeal or revision, a decree even if it be erroneous is still binding between the parties".