Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

(2) The said duty shall be levied--

(a) in the form of a surcharge on the duty imposed by the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (2 of 1899) as in force for the time being in the Union territory of Delhi, on every instrument of the description specified below, and

(b) at such rate as may be determined by the Corporation not exceeding five per cent., on the amount specified below against such instruments--

Description of instrument Amount on which duty should be levied

(i) Sale of immovable property The amount or value of the consideration for the sale, as set forth in the instrument.

(ii) Exchange of immovable property The value of the property of the greater value, as set forth in the instrument.

(iii)Gift of immovable property The value of the property, as set forth in the instrument.

(iv)Mortgage with possession of immovable property The amount secured by the mortgage as set forth in the instrument.

(v) Lease in perpetuity of immovable property The amount equal to one-sixth of the whole amount or value of the rent which would be paid or delivered in respect of the first fifty years of the lease as set forth in the instrument.

6. It is evident from the perusal of Section 147 that the duty leviable, under the said section is in the form of surcharge leviable under the Corporation Act over and above the stamp duty. The transfer duty is thus assessed independently of the stamp duty. The proceeds so collected are credited to the fund of the Corporation. That being so, a conveyance deed cannot be impounded under Section 33 of the Stamp Act, nor can it be subjected to penalty under Section 40 of the said Act for failure to pay the duty envisaged by Section 147 of the Corporation Act. We are fortified in this view by the judgment of a Special Bench of this Court in Dayal Singh v. Collector of Stamps , wherein it was observed that the transfer duty leviable under Section 147 of the Corporation Act, on the transfer of property in the form of surcharge is leviable under the Corporation Act; that the transfer duty is levied and collected over and above the stamp duty, being payable to the Corporation and goes to the Corporation fund; and that the transfer duty is not a percentage of the stamp duty; on the other hand it is a percentage of the amount or value of the consideration for the sale as set forth in the instrument of conveyance. Further, the transfer duty is assessed independently of the stamp duty on the amount of consideration for sale. In the premises, it was held that a sale deed is not 'chargeable' to transfer duty under the Stamp Act and that the instrument of sale cannot either be impounded under Section 33 or can be subjected to the imposition of a penalty under Section 40 of the Stamp Act on the ground that the duty on transfer of property levied under the Corporation Act is either not paid or is insufficiently paid.