Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Earlier in above mentioned case in the year 2004 the HPCL filed an affidavit in which HPCL discloses to the courts that the land of dealership is not on the same land as mentioned in lease deed but it is GAON SABHA LAND (PUBLIC LAND) and address of land is khasra No, 113/3, village Tajpul, New Delhi and Mohanjit Singh is not the owner of the land and HPCL filed the orders of SDM of the year 1981 and 2001. (HPCL affidavit Annexed).

It is pertinent to mention that LRs of Mohanjit Singh parallel to various court proceedings secretly filed an appeal before District Magistrate South East, Old Gargi College Building, Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi to claim the ownership of the khasra No. 113/3 village Tajpul, New Delhi of which they have no tittle deed ,sale deed, further the LRs concealed these proceedings from all courts till date. HPCL has also prepared a tittle search report which confirms the land of retail outlet is of gaon sabha and not of Mohanjit Singh or his LRs. (Copy of HPCL tittle search report is Annexed). Final orders in the RFA20/2016 the court has allowed Mohanlit Singh suit by giving public land rent money from HPCL which is contrary to the Law settled by Supreme Court of India in its judgment JAGPAL SINGH vs STATE of PUNJAB in year 2011. It is the law that no GAON SABHA KUMAR YADAV RFA 20/2016 Page 3 LAND be given to any private person and all encroachments to be removed and ordered that Chief Secretary of ail states to make policy for settled law in another case Supreme Court repeated same orders in Joginder Singh and others vs State of Haryana and others in Fab 2021. (Judgments ANNEXED).

In the proceedings of RFA20/2016 in the year 2017 HPCLfor safety of rent money moved an application and requested to the court for deposit of surety from LRs of Mohanjit Singh. On HPCL request the court ordered LRs of Mohanjit Singh for deposit of surety in the high court, against the release of huge money crores of rupees from HPCL as rental of posh area village Tajpul.( Pls note :It is open fact that village Tajpul is a big urban slum and urban poor area and not posh area as mentioned in court orders) Doing anomalies, violations, misrepresentation, false affidavits regarding public land and public money by LRs, the Mohanjit Singh LRs moved an application for release of surety. Objection by HPCL in its statement before the court stated that they will file written statement to the LRs application.! Order Annexed). Later in orders it is found that the HPCL verbally stated for release of surety to LRs before court. On verbal statement by HPCL court ordered release of the surety to return back to LRs( Order Annexed). No written statement filed by HPCL a govt PSU.

KUMAR YADAV RFA 20/2016 Page 4 (3) how without the written statement of HPCL and by verbal statement of HPCL the surety is being taken back by Mohanjit Singh LRs ?

(4) On whose written instructions HPCL govt PSU not filed written statement in spite of its mention in court orders? PRAYER I request you to save nation property (public property) and money as per law settled in above mentioned Supreme court judgments, Recover public property and money back from Mohanjit Singh and his LRS as per law in above mentioned Supreme Court Judgments, restore the land use Public utility services as ordered in above mentioned Supreme Court judgments, Stop release of surety back to Mohanjit Singh LRs which is lying deposited in High Court of Delhi in the interest of ion and protect Rule of Law settled by Supreme Court of India, Make inquiry, investigation and call for records from courts and give hearing to me on this application of complaint before Hon'ble Chief Justice of India, Hon'ble Chief Justice of Delhi."