Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

(1) State of Andhra Pradesh and others Vs. D. Dastagiri & others (2003) 2 UPLBEC 1697 and another connected case (Para 4) wherein it has been observed as under:
"..............even if the selection process was complete and assuming that only select list was remained to be published, that does not advance the case of the respondents for the simple reason that even the candidates who are selected and whose names find place in the select list, do not get vested right to claim appointment based on the select list............"

In the present case, the opposite parties have failed to show any justifiable reason not to complete the process of selection which was commenced vide advertisement dated 9.9.2011.

As has been observed in the preceding paragraphs that the Government Order 16.3.2012 and the Government Order dated 14.5.2012, which were issued in pursuance of the Government Order dated 15.3.2012 would not be applicable in the present facts and circumstances of the case and no fresh exercise is required to be done in pursuance of Government Order dated 14.5.2012, as such it is held that the stand taken by the opposite parties not to fill up the posts in question at present is totally arbitrary, wrong and unsustainable in the eye of law.

For the facts and reasons given hereinabove, the writ petition is hereby allowed. The opposite parties are directed to complete the process for selection and appointment as Laboratory Assistants (Rural) for which approval was given by the State Government vide Government Order dated 2.8.2011 expeditiously, say, within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before them.

The writ petition is allowed.

Date: September 25, 2012 Arjun/-