Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: 9b explosive act in The State Of Maharashtra vs Kamal Ahmed Mohd. Vakil Ansari And Ors on 21 July, 2025Matching Fragments
xvii. Sec. 151(1) and 153 (Railway Act, 1989) - Sentenced to imprisonment for 5 years on each count.
xviii. Sec. 3 (2) (e) of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 - Sentenced to imprisonment for 5 years and fine of Rs. 10,000/- ( in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 1 month) (Acquitted for the charges u/s 19 and 40 of UAPA, 1967) A.2 - Tanveer Ansari i. Sec. 120-B r/w 121-A and 122 IPC - Sentenced to imprisonment for life on each count and fine of Rs. 20,000/- (in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 2 months) ii. Sec. 120-B r/w 123 IPC - Sentenced to imprisonment for 10 years and fine of Rs. 15,000/- (in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 1 and half months) iii. Sec. 120-B IPC r/w 16 (UAPA, 1967) - Sentenced to imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 20,000/- (in default to suffer imprisonment for 2 months) iv. Sec. 120-B of IPC r/w 13(1) UAPA, 1967 - Sentenced to imprisonment for 7 Years and fine of Rs. 10,000/- (in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 1 month) v. Sec. 20 (UAPA, 1967) - Sentenced to imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 20,000/- ( in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 2 months) vi. Sec. 10 (a) (i) (UAPA, 1967) - Sentenced to imprisonment for 2 years and fine Rs. 10,000/- (in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 1 month) vii. Sec. 120B of IPC r/w 3(1)(i) MCOCA,1999 - Sentenced to imprisonment for life and fine Rs. 1,00,000/- (in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 6 months) viii. Sec. 3(1)(ii) & 3(2) of MCOCA,1999 - Sentenced on each count to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 50,000/- (in default to suffer simple imprisonment for one year) ix. Sec. 3 (4) MCOCA,1999 - Sentenced to imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 5,00,000/- (in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 1 year) x. Sec. 9B(2) Explosives Act, 1884 - Sentenced to imprisonment for 3 years (Acquitted for charge under 124A of IPC) A.3 - Mohd. Faisal Shaikh [ i. Sec. 302 r/w 120-B IPC - Sentenced to death and pay a fine of Rs. 30000/- (in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 3 months) ii. Sec. 307 r/w 120-B IPC - Sentenced imprisonment for life. iii. Sec. 326 r/w 120-B IPC - Sentenced to imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 20000/- ( in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 2 months) iv. Sec. 120-B r/w 121-A and 122 IPC - Sentenced to imprisonment for life on each count and fine of Rs. 20,000/- (in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 2 months) v. Sec. 120-B r/w 123 IPC - Sentenced to imprisonment for 10 years and fine of Rs. 15,000/- (in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 1 and half months) vi. Sec. 120-B of IPC r/w 13(1) UAPA, 1967 - Sentenced to imprisonment for 7 Years and fine of Rs. 10,000/- (in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 1 month) vii. Sec. 201 IPC - Sentenced to imprisonment for 7 years and fine of Rs. 10,000/-(in default to suffer imprisonment for one (1) month) viii. Sec. 325 r/w 120-B IPC - Sentenced to imprisonment for 7 years and fine of 10,000/- (in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 1 month) ix. Sec. 324 r/w 120-B IPC - Sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 3 years and fine of Rs. 10,000 (in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 month) x. Sec. 3(b) (Explosive Substances Act, 1908) - Sentenced to death and fine of Rs. 30000/- (in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 3 months) xi. Sec. 6 r/w 4 (ii) Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sentenced to imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 20,000/- (in default to suffer imprisonment for 2 months) xii. Sec. 9-B(2) Explosives Act, 1884 - Sentenced to imprisonment for 3 years xiii. Sec. 16 (UAPA Act, 1967) - Sentenced to death and fine of Rs.
14. They are also chargesheeted for having possessed, transported and used explosives, alongwith the fifteen wanted accused and two deceased accused, and thereby having contravened the notification issued by the Central Government under section 6 of the Explosives Act, 1884 and having committed an offence punishable under section 9B of the said Act.
15. They are also chargesheeted for having conspired to cause explosions of a nature likely to endanger life or to cause serious injury to property by means of explosive substance, for being in possession of explosive substance for unlawful object and for having procured, counseled, aided, abetted or become accessory to the commission of offences under the Explosive Substances Act, alongwith the fifteen wanted accused and two deceased accused, which are the offences punishable under sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908. They are also chargesheeted for having committed mischief and causing damage to the public property of the Western Railways, alongwith the fifteen wanted accused and two deceased accused, which are the offences punishable under sections 3, 4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984.
302, 307, 326, 325, 324, 427, 436, 120(B), 121,. 122, 123, 124A, 201, 212 of IPC r/w 3(1)(i), 3(2), 3(3), 3(4), 3(5) of MCOCA r/w section 10, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 40 of UAPA, r/w 6 and 9B of the Explosives Act r/w 3, 4, 5, 6 of Explosive Substances Act 1908 r/w 3, 4 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act 1984 r/w 151, P152, 153 and 154 of the Indian Railways Act r/w 12(1)(c) of Passport Act.
24. On completion of the investigation, the investigating officer ACP Patil, PW 186, sent a proposal for obtaining sanction u/s 23(2) MCOCA, which was granted by the CP Mumbai (PW185), on 25/11/06, and finally the chargesheet came to be filed before the MCOCA Special Court on 30th November 2006, which was registered as MCOCA 21/2006. Thereafter, chargesheet was filed against 13 arrested accused persons and 15 wanted accused, most of which were Pakistani. It is the case of the prosecution that 2 of the Pakistani Nationals viz. Salim and Mohammed Ali @ Abu Umed @ Abu Osama died. One died in the explosion itself and other one was encountered at Antop Hill.