Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: false undertaking in Pramod Gupta vs The State on 28 September, 2015Matching Fragments
1. Present criminal revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner Pramod Gupta against the impugned order dated 18.09.2014 passed by Learned MM in case FIR No.08/2010, PS Rajinder Nagar, U/s 420 IPC titled as State Vs. Pramod whereby the learned MM issued directions for framing of charge u/s 420 IPC against the petitioner/Pramod.
2. The brief facts necessary to decide the present revision petition are that one K.K. Gujral, landlord and owner of property bearing No.16A/ 15, WEA, Karol Bagh, New Delhi filed a complaint in the court of M.M. to register an FIR against the petitioner. In his complaint, he stated that the petitioner is the tenant in house No. 16A/15, WEA, Karol Bagh, New Delhi. Already, two electricity meters in the name of the owner were installed in the tenanted premises and the petitioner was not paying his electricity bills regularly. Since the petitioner was the employee of BSES, he illegally got installed a new electricity meter by filing a false undertaking, affidavit and indemnity bond claiming himself to be the owner. On the basis of which BSES officials installed a new meter without his knowledge. On this, the complainant met with XEN but to no avail.