Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Trial Court while rejecting the application for impleadment also found that the suit is for injunction and any order passed in the suit would not impact the respondent no.2-applicant, as he is not a party to the suit. The said finding is not disturbed by the revisional Court.

Learned counsel for the petitioner in support of his case has also referred to the judgments in the cases of; Sudhamayee Pattnaik and others Vs. Bibhu Prasad Sahoo and others; 2022 Supreme (SC) 919, Luis Roberto Vaz Vs. Roque Silvestre Vaz; 1987 Law Suit (Bom) 43 and Kanti Arora: O.P.Khaitan (HUF) Vs. Digjam Ltd; 2022 Law Suit (Del) 1807.