Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: bail rejection in Ajamal Alam @ Ajalam Alam vs The State Of Bihar on 4 April, 2024Matching Fragments
Reg. Cr. Revision No. 557 of 2023 The instant revision has been filed by the CICL under the guardianship of his mother, challenging legality and propriety of the order dated 7th of July, 2023, passed by the learned Special Judge, Children's Court, Aurangabad in Cr. Appeal No. 36 of 2023, arising out of Amba P.S. Case No. 83 of 2023, JJB No. 959 of 2023, whereby and whereunder, the learned Judge, in appeal, dismissed the bail and affirmed the order of rejection of bail passed by the Jurisdictional JJB. Patna High Court CR. REV. No.613 of 2023 dt.04-04-2024 It is submitted by the petitioner that co-accused was granted bail in connection with the same case by a Coordinate Bench of this Court on 9th of November, 2023.
It will not be out of place to mention that CICL was arrested in connection with above-mentioned P.S. Case for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC read with Section 3(1) (r) (s) and 3 (2) (v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Reg. Cr. Revision No. 627 of 2023 The instant Revision is filed by the mother of the CICL, challenging the order of rejection of Bail by the learned Special Judge, Children's Court, Sitamarhi in Cr. Appeal No. 56 of 2023. The CICL was booked for committing offence under Sections 414 and 413 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 205 of 2023.
Reg. Cr. Revision No. 66 of 2024 Patna High Court CR. REV. No.613 of 2023 dt.04-04-2024 The petitioner was booked along with other major accused persons in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 237 of 2022, dated 13th of August, 2022, under Section 302 and 34 of the IPC. The petitioner being a CICL prayed for bail before the Juvenile Justice Board, but his prayer for bail was rejected. He preferred an appeal under Section 101 of the said Act before the learned Special Judge, Children's Court and the said appeal was also dismissed and the order of rejection of bail passed by the JJB was affirmed. It is stated by the petitioner that the accused persons who are major, namely, Sushil Kumar Yadav and Anil Yadav were granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court on 26th of April, 2023 in Cr. Misc. No. 4091 of 2023.
He prayed for bail before the JJB which was rejected on 3rd of October, 2023. He preferred Cr. Appeal No. 35 of 2023 against the said order of rejection of bail before the learned Special Judge, Children's Court at Katihar. The learned Special Judge rejected the prayer for bail and dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner.
Reg. Cr. Revision No. 117 of 2024 This Revision is directed against an order passed by Patna High Court CR. REV. No.613 of 2023 dt.04-04-2024 the learned Special Judge-cum-Children's Court, Kaimur in Cr. Appeal No. 36 of 2023, which was dismissed vide order dated 17th of October, 2023 and thereby the order passed by the learned JJB rejecting the prayer for bail was affirmed. The petitioner was made an accused in connection with Chand P.S. Case 86 of 2023 dated 7th of May, 2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 365/366(A) and 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012.