Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

- 11 -

dimensions of 20 x 24 meters, as mentioned in the advertisement as well as brochure (Annexure P-2). Another .

proposal put forth on behalf of the present petitioner i.e. khasra No.1003 was also not found suitable by the committee since same was not owned by the petitioner or any member of the 'family unit' as given in multiple dealership/distributorship of norm provided under the brochure, as referred hereinabove. Mr. Sood, vehemently argued that in view of the aforesaid specific rt report rendered by field verifying agency, case of the petitioner could not be considered at all for allotment of 'RGGLV' at Parwara, District Mandi, HP and as such, there is no illegality and infirmity in the order dated 28.10.2011, whereby candidature of the petitioner was rejected specifically detailing therein the reasons for not considering the case of the petitioner. While referring to the contention put forth on behalf of the petitioner that the Local Commissioner, specifically reported that khasra No.994 is abutted to the road, Mr. Sood, stated that inspection was carried out on 2.3.2013 and Commissioner submitted the report before the Hon, ble Court on 17th March April, 2013, to which corporation filed objection on 22nd April, 2013. Mr. Sood , forcibly contended that link road

(g) own a suitable land(plot) of minimum 20 metre X 24 metre in dimension at the advertised RGGLV location for construction of LPG cylinder Storage Godown.

- 14 -

Own means having clear ownership title of the property in the name of applicant/ family member of the 'Family Unit' as defined in multiple dealership/ distributorship norms. In case of ownership/co- ownership by family member, consent letter from the family member will be required.

15. Clause 4(g) of the brochure, as has been reproduced hereinabove, clearly provides that applicant should own a suitable plot of minimum 20x24 in dimension for construction of LPG Cylinder storage/ godown. It further provides that own means having clear ownership title of the property in the name of the applicant/ family member of the 'Family Unit' as defined in multiple dealership/distributorship norm. It further provides that in case ownership/ co-ownership by the family member, consent letter from the family member would be required. Similarly, in clause-4, multiple

- 18 -

dealership/distributorship and family unit have been defined, wherein it has been provided that multiple dealership norms means that the .

applicant or other family of the 'family unit'.

16. Since, it is an admitted case of the petitioner herself that Sh. Jalam Singh, in no manner, was related to her, this Court sees no illegality in the order passed by the Corporation, wherein offer given by the petitioner to construct the godown on khasra No.1003, was of rejected on the ground that the same was not found owned by the applicant or by any member of 'Family Unit' as given multiple rt dealership/distributorship norm. As far as, khasra No.994, which was offered by the present petitioner as a first choice in her application (Annexure P-1), is concerned, corporation vide communication dated 28.10.2011 stated that khasra No.994 was not found suitable for the construction of godown since the same is not approachable and it is covered on all sides by the land owned by others.