Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

(ii) That entire statements and materials from the other case i.e., R. C. Case No. 20A/1996 have been adopted in the instant case. There is no material to connect this appellant with the fraudulent withdrawals from Chaibasa Treasury in the Financial Year 1992-93 under A.H.D. Department, subject matter of the instant trial

(iii) That appellant had been facing trial in altogether 7 R. C. Cases relating to Fodder Scam Case, namely the present one i.e. R. C. Case Nos. 68(A)/96; R.C. Case No. 20(A)/96 which relates to the fraudulent withdrawal for the period 1994-95 under the same Chaibasa Treasury; R.C. Case No. 22(A)/96 which relates to the fraudulent withdrawal for the period January, 1992 to June, 1992 under Godda Treasury; R.C. Case No. 33(A)/96 which relates to the fraudulent withdrawal for the period November, 1995 to January, 1996 from Godda Treasury; R.C. Case No. 64(A)/96 which relates to the fraudulent withdrawal for the period 1988- 1996 from Dumka Treasury and R. C. Case No. 38(A)/96 for the period 1990-91 to 1995-96 and in R.C. Case No. 47A/996, trial is going on.