Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Docket explosion in Nalli Chinnasami Chetty And 2 Ors vs Nalli Sambbasivm And 2 Ors on 15 January, 2020Matching Fragments
7] Thus, we need to decide whether afore-noted facts show a negligence which has reached the level being supine negligence or indifference to the litigation being pursued.
8] The facts noted herein-above show as regards the client whatever steps were required to be taken were diligently taken. The negligence is by the counsel and if supine or indifference, the same would be attributable to the counsel and not the client. It needs to be highlighted that the client is stationed in Chennai. We also cannot lose sight that due to docket explosion in the Bombay High Court large number of matters are not listed in the cause list on the date reflected in the CMIS system.