Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: paramathi in Raj @ Surendar ... Revision vs State Rep. By on 28 April, 2022Matching Fragments
This Criminal Revision Case has been filed to set aside the order dated 22.12.2021, passed in Cr.M.P.No.278 of 2021 in C.A.No.113 of 2021, on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for trial of cases Registered under SC/ST (PoA) Act, Namakkal.
2. The petitioner Raj @ Surender is arrayed as Accused No.2 in C.C.No.8 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Paramathi. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramathi, by judgment dated 31.03.2021 found the petitioner/A2 guilty under Sections 458, 342 and 380 r/w 34 of IPC, convicted and sentenced him as follows:
3. Challenging the same, the petitioner preferred an appeal in C.A.No.113 of 2021 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for Trial of Cases registered under SC/ST (PoA) Act, Namakkal, along with Criminal Miscellaneous Petition in Crl.M.P.No.278 of 2021, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis for suspending the sentence imposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramathi.
ars To
1. The Sessions Judge, Special Court for Trial of Cases registered under SC/ST (PoA) Act, Namakkal.
2. The Inspector of Police, Paramathi Police Station, Namakkal District.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.