Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

4. It is the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that already charge sheet has been filed. Initially the complaint was registered against unknown persons. The charge sheet material indicates that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in the alleged crime. He further submitted that there are so many contradictions and omissions with regard to the colour of 'T' shirt and even with regard to the injuries suffered by the injured. He further submitted that the accused-petitioner was also taken to the hospital for examination and it was found that the injuries suffered were about 10 days prior to the examination. He further submitted that when the complaint was registered, it is CW.1 who was the only eye witness but subsequently, the case has been improved and one more eye witness has been mentioned. He further submitted that further statements of the witnesses have been recorded, wherein they have stated that they identified the accused and TI parade has been held after 21 days and the identification of the accused was got done. He further submitted that the accused was already known to the witnesses and thereafter they have identified him and as such the TI parade conducted is not going to help the case of the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the alleged crime. Petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions imposed by this Court and ready to offer sureties. On these grounds, he prayed to allow the petition and to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. Per contra, learned SPP vehemently argued and submitted that statements of the deceased, the injured eye witnesses have been recorded and if the said evidence is unrebutted, then definitely it is going to help the case of the prosecution. Though there are some contradictions and omissions, they cannot be looked into at this stage by evaluating the material which has been placed. He further submitted that the material on record clearly indicates the involvement of the accused in a serious offence of causing the death of the deceased. He further submitted that TI parade has also been conducted wherein eye witnesses have identified the accused. He further submitted that the petitioner is involved in many more cases and as such he is not having any good antecedents. If he is enlarged on bail he may involve in such crimes and he may also create a communal in the society. On these grounds, he prayed to dismiss the petition.