Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

2. Being grieved by the aforesaid order, the Union of India preferred an appeal under Section 37(2) of the Act before the Division Bench which concurred with the opinion expressed by the learned Single Judge.

3. In appeal by special leave, the two-Judge Bench in Union of India v. Hardy Exploration and Production (India) INC1 referred to certain 1 (2018) 7 SCC 374 decisions from foreign jurisdictions, namely, Naviera Amazonica Peruana S.A. v. Compania Internacional De Seguros Del Peru2, Hiscox v. Outhwaite3, Union of India v. McDonnell Douglas Corpn.4, C v. D5, C v. D6, Braes of Doune Wind Farm (Scotland) Limited v. Alfred McAlpine Business Services Limited7, Shashoua and Ors. v. Sharma8, Sulamerica Cia Nacional De Seguros S.A. and Ors. v. Enesa Engenharia SA & Ors.9, (1) Enercon GMBH (2) Wobben Properties GMBH v. Enercon (India) Ltd.10 and Govt. Of India v. Petrocon India Ltd.11 Apart from the above, the decisions rendered in Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd. v. ONGC Ltd. and Others12, Bhatia International v. Bulk Trading S.A. and Another 13, Venture Global Engineering v. Satyam Computer Services Ltd. & another14, Videocon Industries Limited v. Union of India and another15, Dozco India Private Ltd. v. Doosan Infracore Co. Limited16, Bharat 2 (1988) (1) Lloyd’s Law Reports 116 3 (1992) 1 AC 562 4 (1993) 2 Lloyd’s Law Reports 48 5 (2007) EWCA Civ 1282 (CA) 6 (2008) 1 Lloyd’s Law Reports 239 7 (2008) EWHC 426 (TCC) 8 (2009) EWHC 957 (Comm.) 9 (2012) EWCA Civ 638 10 (2012) EWHC 3711 (Comm.) 11 (2016) SCC Online MYFC 35 12 (1998) 1 SCC 305 13 (2002) 4 SCC 105 14 (2008) 4 SCC 190 15 (2011) 6 SCC 161 16 (2011) 6 SCC 179 Aluminium Company v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services INC17, Enercon (India) Ltd. & Others v. Enercon GMBH & Another18, Reliance Industries Limited and another v. Union of India19, Harmony Innovation Shipping Ltd. v. Gupta Coal India Limited and another20, Union of India v. Reliance Industries Limited and Others21, Eitzen Bulk A/s & others v. Ashapura Minechem Limited and another22, Imax Corporation v. E-City Entertainment (India) Pvt. Lid.23 and Roger Shashoua and others v. Mukesh Sharma and others24 were also referred to.