Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: ATTINGAL in The Deputy General Manager vs Abdul Hameed on 12 February, 2025Matching Fragments
10. Sri.V.Ajaykumar, the learned counsel appearing for the claimants would further point out that the acceptance of document No.925/2008 was no doubt questioned by the requisitioning authority earlier and the said challenge was accepted by this Court and the reference was remanded back to Sub Court, Attingal for a fresh consideration. On fresh consideration once the reference court accepted the evidence, namely sale deed No.925/2008, on appeal, the requisitioning authority and the State cannot question the findings in the absence of any evidence before the reference court.
2025:KER:11221 L.A.App. 558/2022 & conn APPELLANT'S ANNEXURES Annexure A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE VAKALATH FILED BY K.G.GIRISH BABU, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ELECTRONICS TECHONOLOGY PARKS IN NO. 128/2012 BEFORE THE SUB COURT, ATTINGAL THROUGH ADVOCATE LAR SRI.A.AMANULLA.
Annexure 2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE DOCUMENT WITH NO.1371/2007 OF SRO, MURUKKUMPUZHA DATED 12.7.2007 .