Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

Page 27 of 51

C/LPA/436/2006 JUDGMENT 7.9 Mr. Pathak contended that the appellants have infact tried to commit contempt of Court by not following the directions issued by the Division Bench way back in 1993 till 2006. He submitted that in fact the appellants have tried to create two classes of employees namely those who have worked for less than five years and the other who have worked for more than five years. He submitted that the resolution is ultra vires to the extent that it creates such fragmentation amongst the daily rated employees.