Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

9. The respondent was not a necessary party and the complainant was not a consumer and it was not maintainable for want of notice under section 80 of C.P.C.

10. The staff collected the samples in Survey Nos.230/6, 138/2, 96/5, 354, 300, 252/2, 253/1 and 367. It was not correct the Groundnut crop was raised with bore-well in Survey Nos.230/6, 138/2, 252/2 and 253/1 because there was no water in bore-well in Survey No.138/2 and the crop was raised with rainwater and in Survey No.230/6, there was bore without electric motor and so it was raised with rainwater and there was no bore-well in Survey No.253/1. There was bore-well without water in Survey No.252/2. If the farmers raised the crops with bore-well, it would have brought to the notice of the officials at the time of collecting the sample. Yield would depend upon nature, fertility of soil and maintenance. The Government assisted Agricultural Insurance Co. Ltd., in assessing crop loss.