Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: DESIGN defect in Shri Sudhir Vohra vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporation on 18 March, 2010Matching Fragments
31. He would further submit that pillar No 67 is not the only Pillar which had a defective design resulting in its collapse. There are a large number of other pillars which are tottering due to defective design. DMRC is trying to cover up its mistake by hook and by crook. He would plead that Metro system affects the safety and security of the travelling public and the people have a right to know asto what kind of design has gone into the construction of system, including the pillars.
1032. He also shows certain unsigned documents to the Commission relating to the construction of Metro system. According to him, apart from faulty design, no proper checks were exercised by DMRC Management resulting in 'failed' and 'tottering' structures. He would also mention that at a particular point of time, there were separate designers, separate builders and separate checkers but thereafter all these functions were concentrated into the hands of one entity, resulting in defective design and inefficient execution of works.