Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

So both derive their power from and, partake of, a common source, - the "judicial power" of a sovereign State. They necessarily share the common features characteristic of and incidental to the very nature of the power they exercise; and to the commonness of the source of that power. In the case of Courts, however, the procedure followed by, and usually associated with, them and the possession of certain inherent and subsidiary powers intended to help them to effectuate their task are described as the usual "trappings" of the Courts. But the presence of some or all of these "trappings" in an adjudicatory-forum is not necessarily conclusive as to its character as a "Court" if it, otherwise does not share the essential characteristics of one. The line of distinction between a "court" and a "Tribunal" in some cases is indeed fine though real. All Courts are Tribunals but the converse need not necessarily be true. Their procedures may differ, but their functions are not necessarily, different. "What distinguishes them" it is said, "has never been established". Lord Stanp said that the real distinction is that the Courts have an air of detachment". But this is "more a matter of age and traditions and not of the essence".