Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: version changed in Manickam vs Sakunthala @ Rajeswari on 23 January, 2006Matching Fragments
19. The learned counsel for the appellant drew my attention to the deposition of D.W.1 and pointed out the following answers elicited from D.W.1 in his cross-examination. D.W.1 has stated in his cross examination that because of blood pressure, he could not recollect as to what happened even the previous day and he is not capable of remembering as to what happened even half-an-hour earlier and he does not remember as to where Ex.B.1 was written, in which year month and date on which it was written. He does not remember whether the Will was written in the morning or in the evening. D.W.1 has stated that Ex.B.1 was written at the house of Ramachandran, but immediately he changed his version and told that Ex.B.1 was written at the house of scribe Palaniswamy Chettiyar and Ex.B.1 Will was written as per the instructions of D.W.1. D.W.1 has stated that in Ex.B.1 Will Savadammal affixed only one thumb impression. D.W.1 has admitted that Ramachandran took care of all the necessary things for the execution of Ex.B.1. But immediately he changed his version and stated that Ramachandran did not know anything about Ex.B.1 Will.