Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: computer forensics in Cbi vs Ravinder Ram Constable on 19 January, 2019Matching Fragments
15.14 PW22 Sh. Gautam Roy Retd. Sr. Scientific Officer and Head of the Department in the computer forensic and head of the department in the computer Forensic Division & Photo Division in CFSL CBI New Delhi examined the memory cards and micro SD card Ex. 6/1 to 6/5 and came to the conclusion that there was continuous flow of video and there was no stoppage, pause etc. and, therefore, there was no tampering on the aforesaid five memory cards. He proved his report as Ex. PW 22/A. (D) Complainant and other public witnesses 15.15 PW2 Sh. Dinesh Kumar, Asstt. Branch Manager (Sales) LIC of India, Shimla has deposed that on 15.12.2014 he reached CBI office, CGO Complex on the directions of his office. He proved the photocopy of the order as Ex. PW 2/A. He further deposed that in the CBI office an officer of CBI along with Chetan Prakash (wrongly mentioned as Chander Prakash) was present and they showed him some audio video recording and also the transcription of the conversation in the clipping. On the instructions of the I.O., he verified the transcription with conversation recorded in the clipping and signed the same. He proved the copy of transcription as Ex. PW 2/B. He also proved the transcription-cum-voice identification memo prepared at CBI office as Ex. PW 2/C. He also deposed that Chetan Prakash had identified the pictures of the persons appearing in the clippings but he could not recall if complainant had identified his voice.