Skip to main content
Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
Reservation Number of Vacant Number of sponsoring
candidates in 1:5 Ratio
SC Priority 1 3 (Available)
BC Priority 1 2 (Available)
MBC Priority 1 1 (Circulated other
Employment Candidate)
Total 10 40 + 1
2.1. In continuation with the above process, the District Employment
Exchange, Karur sent a list consisting of 10 candidates vide letter dated
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
22.06.2009. Immediately, the interview process was completed and 9
candidates were selected by the interview committee. Pursuant to the
selection made in the interview, four candidates were appointed on
18.09.2009 and 13.11.2009. Subsequently, after completion of the selection
process, the District Employment Exchange, Trichy has sent the names of 41
candidates and the District Employment Exchange, Perambalur has sent the
names of 10 candidates on 14.07.2009. The list of candidates sent by the
District Employment Exchange, Trichy and Perambalur were returned on
10.12.2009 by stating administration reasons. The name of the writ petitioner
was not forwarded by the District Employment Exchange, Trichy on the
ground that he has crossed the eligible upper age. But the age relaxation
prescribed by the Government was not followed by the Transport Corporation
and not extended to the writ petitioner herein. Subsequently, he filed a Writ
Petition in W.P.(MD).No.8798 of 2009 seeking the relief of age relaxation
and direction to the District Employment Officer, Trichy to sponsor his name
to the notified post. Based on the direction passed by this Court in W.P.
(MD).No.8798 of 2009, his name was sponsored to the Transport Corporation
on 07.01.2011 and it was returned by the Corporation stating that no
recruitment was made in the year 2011.