Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: gender equality in Dr. Tp Senkumar Ips vs Union Of India And Ors on 24 April, 2017Matching Fragments
9. Resort to Article 32 read with Article 142 of the Constitution in such situations was in continuation of similar views expressed in Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan[3] wherein this Court held in paragraph 16 of the Report that in the absence of enacted law, “…… to provide for the effective enforcement of the basic human right of gender equality and guarantee against sexual harassment and abuse, more particularly against sexual harassment at workplaces, we lay down the guidelines and norms specified hereinafter for due observance at all workplaces or other institutions, until a legislation is enacted for the purpose. This is done in exercise of the power available under Article 32 of the Constitution for enforcement of the fundamental rights and it is further emphasised that this would be treated as the law declared by this Court under Article 141 of the Constitution.” A similar view was taken by this Court in Vineet Narain v. Union of India[4] wherein this Court held in paragraph 49 of the Report as follows: