Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: NOC FOR INTERVIEW in N.Sankar vs Union Of India Represented By The ... on 4 December, 2008Matching Fragments
2. Vide Annexure A-8, the applicant has requested the Divisional Railway Manager, Trivandrum Division, for a service certificate and to forward his service documents to K.S.E.B so that he could earn the terminal benefits in full after his retirement in K.S.E.B. This was not responded to. It appears that the applicant had thereafter requested for payment of terminal benefits from the Railways itself. His request presumably is contained in his letter dated 20.3.2007. This was referred to in the impugned order dated 18.5.2007 vide Annexure A-9 wherein it was stated that his application to K.S.E.B was not forwarded by the Personnel Branch and based on his request for attending interview NOC was issued to him. The applicant has responded to the above communication vide Annexure A-10 letter dated 5.6.2007 stating that he applied only through proper channel and requested the Railways to deem him to have retired from service with effect from 9.12.1999. As no further communication was received the applicant has filed this O.A praying for a declaration that he is entitled to be granted pension and other retirement benefit with effect from 9.12.1999 duly deeming him to have retired from service with effect from that date and also for a direction to the respondents to grant him monthly pension and all other retirement benefits as if he had retired from the Railway Service with effect from 9.12.1999 with all consequential arrears of pension and other benefits.
3. Respondents have contested the O.A. According to them, the applicant has applied to the K.S.E.B directly without routing the application through the Railways. They have invited the attention of this Tribunal to Annexure A-3 application wherein the applicant himself stated that he had submitted the application to K.S.E.B due to anticipated delay. Annexure A-4 is only a NOC to attend the interview and it does not prove that the application for the post was earlier forwarded through proper channel. They had, therefore, prayed for the dismissal of the O.A.