Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: RFCT act in J.Deepak vs The Secretary To Government on 24 November, 2021Matching Fragments
15. 02.01.2019 Public Hearing conducted by the Collector.
16. 07.01.2019 Expert Committee constituted under Section 7(2) of RFCT-
17. 21.03.2019 Final SIA Report submitted by the SIA Agency after consider-
ing the objections and claims filed.
• That he and Deepa are
class II heirs;
• That acquisition for
memorial will not fall
within the definition of
public purpose under
Sec.2(1) of the RFCT-
LARR Act.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Nos.9285 & 10135 of 2020
Sl. Date What happened How the petitioners
No. responded
• That SIA study is not
correct.
• OSA 445/2018 &
O.P.630/2018 are re-
served for orders.
Hence declarations
made are improper.
29. 19.05.2020 Public Notice under Section
21(1) of the Act published call-
ing for representation for per-
sons interested for an award en-
quiry.
Addressed (for the first time) to
Deepa and Deepak.
30. 22.05.2020 Tamil Nadu Acts and Ordin-
ances No.3/2020 passed- for a
long term administration of the
intended memorial.
31. 26.05.2020 G.O.(Ms) No.55 – Government
Order sanctioning a sum of
RS.67,16,61,225/- as Tentative
Compensation Amount for Veda
Nilayam, in pursuance to the
proceedings of the District Col-
lector dated 26.08.2019, claim-
ing compensation amount at
Rs.76,66,90,363/-.
32. 27.05.2020 & 29.05.2020 :
61. This is the statutory setting in which petitioners’ allegations of procedural lapses/violations would be tested. Their allegations can be divided into three parts: First, that pertains to appointment or constitution of various authorities such as the Social Impact Agency, or constituting the District Collector, Chen- nai as the Appropriate-Government for purposes associated with the RFCT- LARR Act, and the latter’s power of delegation of his authority to the Revenue Divisional Authority. Second, that which relates to SIA and Rehabilitation and Resettlement package, where the petitioners allege that the authorities do not strictly adhere to the statutory command. Lastly, to the issue of notices – or, non-issue of notices & fairness of procedure. Of them this Court will focus only on the last two, and they will be now considered in the same order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.9285 & 10135 of 2020