Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: procured document in Sh. Rakesh Maini vs Sh. Deepak Maini on 31 January, 2022Matching Fragments
65. Now I shall deal with the additional issues framed on 22.02.2019 as under:-
(vi) "Whether conveyance deed dt. 27.04.2009 is forged and fabricated? OPP"
The onus to prove the Conveyance Deed dt.
Rakesh Maini Vs. Deepak Maini (CS No.611063/2016 Deepak Maini Vs. Rakesh Maini (11565/2016) Page: 40/54 27.04.2009 filed by defendant in CS No. 11565/16 is forged and fabricated is upon Rakesh Maini as in the amended Written Statement filed by Rakesh Maini in CS No. 11565/16 he has alleged in the Written Statement that the Conveyance Deed is false forged and fabricated and therefore it be declared null and void. It is also claimed that Sh. Kurnesh Sharma the original allottee of the suit premises never executed any document of attorney or Conveyance Deed in favour of Deepak Maini and since the said Conveyance Deed was neither filed in the Written Statement by Deepak Maini in Civil Suit no. 611063/16 (lead case) or in the replication in CS No. 11565/16, it is a manipulated document procured to defeat the claim of the defendant Rakesh Maini.