Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: mandeep singh in Mandeep Singh vs State Of Punjab And Others on 21 April, 2022Matching Fragments
In case, the cost of Rs.5,000/- is not deposited by the petitioner with the High Court Lawyers' Welfare Fund, then the present petition would be deemed to have been dismissed. "
In pursuance of the said order, a report has been submitted by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ludhiana to the Registrar General of this Court. The relevant portion of the said report is reproduced hereinbelow:-
2 of 8 "Thereafter accused Mandeep Singh son of Jaswant Singh got recorded his statement that compromise has been effected with complainant Vipan Passi as per compromise deed Ex.C1 and he also deposited amount of Rs.5,000/- as per the directions of Hon'ble High Court and copy of receipt is Mark A. xxx--xxx--xxx The pointwise information as sought by Hon'ble Court of Punjab and Haryana vide order dated 8.3.2022 passed is as under:
i) So far as question of number of persons arrayed as accused in FIR is in concern, on the perusal of papers and as per statement of IO it is observed that FIR has been registered against three persons i.e. Kulwinder Singh, Mandeep Singh and Sadhvi Rajni. Out of which Sadhvi Rajni has been declared as innocent during inquiry/investigation and accused Kulwinder Singh and Mandeep Singh have been declared as Proclaimed Offenders vide order dated 7.3.2020. However accused Mandeep Singh has been ordered to be released on bail on 8.4.2021 in view of order passed by the Court of Sh. KK Jain Ld. Additional Sessions Judge Ludhiana dated 2.4.2021.
ii) It is most humbly submitted that as per statement of IO, accused Kulwinder Singh and Mandeep Singh have been declared as Proclaimed Offenders vide order dated 7.3.2020. However accused Mandeep Singh has been ordered to be released on bail on 8.4.2021 in view of order passed by the Court of Sh. KK Jain Ld. Additional Sessions Judge Ludhiana dated 2.4.2021.
iii) In view of the abovesaid statements it appears that the compromise so arrived between the 3 of 8 parties is genuine, without any coercion voluntarily and out of free will.
iv) It is further humbly submitted that as per statement of complainant Vipan Passi, two similar criminal cases are pending against accused Mandeep Singh one at Dera Bassi and other at Mohali Court and accused Mandeep Singh had also been declared as Proclaimed Offender in complaint filed by son of complainant Rohit Passi against accused Mandeep Singh U/s 138 Negotiable Instrument Act and compromise has also been effected in those cases with accused Mandeep Singh. On the other hand, as per statement of accused Mandeep Singh there are four criminal cases are pending against him at Mohali Court and had also been declared as Proclaimed Offender in complaint U/s 138 NI Act filed by son of complainant Rohit Passi against him and compromise has also been effected in that complaint with the son of complainant Rohit Passi. Accused Mandeep Singh has also furnished an affidavit regarding pendency of said four criminal cases. However as per statement of ASI Randhir Singh Investigating Officer, total five cases U/s 420 IPC are pending against accused Mandeep Singh. Details of which have been mentioned above.