Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: RAM NAIK in Ipra Venkat vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 9 February, 2024Matching Fragments
6. The learned trial Court, after appreciating the oral and documentary evidence available on record, convicted the appellants for the offence as mentioned in the opening paragraph of the judgment, against which this appeal has been preferred by the appellants Neutral Citation 2024:CGHC:4550-DB Criminal Appeal Nos. 1112 of 2017 & 344 of 2018 questioning the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence.
7. Shri Roop Ram Naik, learned counsel appearing for the appellants, would submit that the appellants have falsely been implicated in crime in question and they have been convicted by recording a finding which is perverse to the record. He would further submit that if the entire case is taken as it is, at the most, only offence under Section 304 Part-II of I.P.C. is made out, therefore, the conviction of appellants under Section 302 of I.P.C. may be altered/converted to Section 304 Part-II of I.P.C. and the sentence imposed upon them be reduced to the period already undergone by them, as the appellants are in jail since 01.04.2013 i.e. almost 11 years.