Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: fodder scam in Dr. Jitendra Kumar Srivastava vs State Of Jharkhand And Ors. on 6 October, 2005Matching Fragments
S.J. Mukhopadhaya, A.C.J.
1. This application has been preferred by the petitioner for directions on the respondents for grant of the following benefits to him :
(A) Arrears of pension after finalisation and fixation of the same (B) Full amount of Gratuity (C) Leave Encashment (D) Salary for the period not paid and (E) Benefit of Assured Career Progression.
2. The petitioner was in the services of the State in the Animal Husbandry Department and having made an accused in a criminal case, "commonly known as Fodder Scam case", he was suspended on 30.1.2002. While in custody, he superannuated from service on 31.8.2002. After retirement, he has been paid Provisional Pension (90%). His grievance is that the respondents had not paid him the gratuity amount, leave encashment amount, Salary for certain period during which he had worked nor his for grant of the benefit to Assured Career Progression had been considered by the respondents.