Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

8. Besides the oral evidence, the prosecution placed reliance on seizure memo Exh.63, birth certificate .....10/-

Judgment 471 apeal892.22 & 690.23 Exh.65, requisition for calling panchas Exh.72, letter by forest office Exh.73, memorandum statement of accused No.2 Akash Exh.75, recovery panchanama Exh.76, electricity bill Exh.77, requisition to call panchas Exh.84, spot panchanama Exh.87, spot panchanama of assault by cutter Exh.86, requisition letter to the medical officer Exh.91, injury report Exh.92, query letter Exh.93, query letter Exh.94, requisition letter to the medical officer Exh.96, medial report Exh.97, requisition letter to the medical officer Exh.101, medical certificate Exh.102, requisition letter Exh.105, extract of the register maintained as per the provisions of the PCPNDT Act, sonography report Exh.107, requisition Exh.112, arrest panchanama of accused No.2 Akash Exh.117, letter to CA for calling DNA Kit Exh.118, letter to CA for preserving DNA samples Exh.119, arrest panchanama of accused No.1 Saurabh Exh.120, seizure memo Exhs.121, letter to .....11/-

Judgment 471 apeal892.22 & 690.23 the medical officer for obtaining samples of accused No.2 Akash Exh.123, letter to CA to obtain DNA kit to collect samples of accused No.1 Saurabh Exh.124, seizure memo as seizure of samples of accused No.1 Saurabh Exh.125, letter to CA Exh.126, seizure of samples of victim Exh.127, seizure memo of vehicle Exh.128, letter to CA Exh.129, and CA reports Exhs.132 to 134.

9. On the basis of the said oral as well as the documentary evidence, the prosecution claimed that the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.

Judgment 471 apeal892.22 & 690.23 police have brought DNA kit along with identification and declaration form. She filled the same form and obtained blood samples of the victim in the presence of LPC Ranjita and two nurses. The identification declaration form is at Exh.98. During the cross examination, only it was brought on record that she has not personally treated the injuries of the victim. She admitted that the injury report of the victim was not seen by her. Rest of the cross examination is in the denial form.

52. The evidence of Investigating Officer PW9 Babasaheb Thorat also shows that he has communicated with the Deputy Director, Forensic Science Laboratory, .....48/-

Judgment 471 apeal892.22 & 690.23 Nagpur to obtain DNA Kit by communications dated 14.2.2018 and 20.2.2018 and obtained the DNA Kit for obtaining samples. Admittedly, the said samples are obtained vide panchanama Exh.125 dated 22.2.2018 and 18.2.2018. The said samples are forwarded on 22.2.2018 and the samples were analyzed from 22.2.2018 to 3.6.2019. There is no evidence that the samples obtained were in intact condition and there is no chance of tampering since it was seized till the same were forwarded to the DNA Analysis.