Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: computer forensics in Sc No. 57715/16 State vs . Smt. Rajesh And Another 1 Of Total Pages ... on 6 July, 2018Matching Fragments
SC No. 57715/16 State Vs. Smt. Rajesh and another 25 of total pages 43
62. He had compared the specimen voice sample with the questioned voice sample in the Pen driver. On auditory analysis and subsequent acoustic analysis using computerized speech lab Ex.Q1 was found similar to Ex. S1, Ex.Q2 was found similar to Ex. S2 and Ex.Q4 was found similar to Ex. S4. He further testified that quality of voice sample of speaker marked Q3, Smt. Rajesh was very poor, hence the speaker identification test could not be carried out for the same. He further testified that the mobile marked Ex.1a was forwarded to computer forensic unit as no relevant data was found on the retrieved data. He proved the detailed report as Ex. PW31/A.