Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

vi) AIR 1957 SC 614;

vii) 2013 (3) MLJ Crl. 481;

viii) 2019 (3) SCC Crl. 309;

ix) 2019 (7) SCC 781;

x) 2004 Crl. L.J. 1904;

xi) 2008 (3) MLJ Crl. 257;

xii) Crl.A.No.524 of 2016, arising out of SLP(Crl.)No.2496 of 2016;

xiii) 2016 (1) MWN (Cr.) 292 (DB); and

xiv) 1997 MLJ Crl. 257.

8. Per contra, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor by referring the evidence of the prosecution witnesses would submit that the prosecution has established its case beyond reasonable doubt. PW1 is an injured witness and PW2 is none other than the sister's daughter of the accused and the evidence of PW1 and PW2 was corroborated by the evidence of PWs.3 to 6. http://www.judis.nic.in