Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: dd act in Shivi Talwar vs Government Of National Capital ... on 8 March, 2019Matching Fragments
46. The net result of the aforesaid discussion is that the decision in Sunil Goel (supra) is clearly distinguishable on facts and does not come to the aid of the Petitioners. Throughout the Petitioners have had an interim order in their favour and, therefore, the limitation for issuing a notification under Section 6 of the LAA consequent upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the Vasant Kunj Enclave case, has not commenced.
47. There was a contention about the de-notification of Development Area 176, including the lands in question, included in the notification dated 1st June, 2010 issued under Section 12 of the Delhi Development Act („DD Act‟). The Court is not called upon to examine this contention in these petitions for the simple reason that the main relief sought is a declaration that no notification under Section 6 of the LAA can be issued hereafter. The Court finds that the said relief cannot be granted in any of these petitions for the reasons aforementioned.