Skip to main content
Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
12. The DRP was of the view that just because the company is providing cloud based
services over various mainframe computers, the company would not be functionally
different as claimed by the assessee and rejected this plea of the assessee.
13. Regarding the plea of the assessee that this company is into high end ITES service
provider, and hence not comparable, the DRP held that under TNMM, there is no
requirement that the comparables should render the same or identical services. It would
be sufficient, if the services fall under the broad industry segment ITES. In this regard
the DRP relied on the Bangalore Tribunal decision in the case of GE India Technology
Centre (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. DIT [2013] 30 taxmann.com 249/141 ITD 245 and other
decisions wherein it was observed that TNMM requires only broad comparability.