Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: paruthipattu in C.N.Govindaraj vs The Principal Commissioner And on 21 January, 2019Matching Fragments
The prayer sought for in W.P.No.11627 of 2004 is for a writ of certioraified mandamus, calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the Competent Authority (Urban Land Ceiling) and Assistant Commissioner (Urban Land Tax), Poonamallee, Chennai - 600 056 and issued in S.R.No.545/94/D, dated 23.05.1995 under Section 9(5) of the Tamil Nadu Act, 24 of 1978 and the Final Statement issued in Form III under Section 10(1) of the said Act in Rc.1879/95/dated 05.08.1995 and culminating in issue of notice under Section 11(5) of the said Act and quash the same and consequently forbearing the respondents herein or anybody claiming or acting through them from in any manner proceeding with or in and enjoyment of the lands by the petitioner herein and comprised in S.No.503/2, Paruthipattu village, Sriperumbutur Taluk in an extent of 27 cents as the proceedings initiated by the second respondent has abated in view of the Repealing Act 20/1999.
http://www.judis.nic.in
2. The prayer sought for in W.P.No.15563 of 2004 is for a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the Competent Authority (Urban Land Ceiling) and Assistant Commissioner (Urban Land Tax), Poonamallee, Chennai - 600 056 and issued in S.R.No.545/94/D, dated 23.05.1995 under Section 9(5) of the Tamil Nadu Act, 24 of 1978 and the Final Statement issued in Form III under Section 10(1) of the said Act in Rc.1879/95/dated 05.08.1995 and culminating in issue of notice under Section 11(5) of the said Act and quash the same and consequently forbearing the respondents herein or anybody claiming or acting through them from in any manner proceeding with or in and enjoyment of the lands by the petitioner herein and comprised in S.No.503/2, Paruthipattu village, Sriperumbutur Taluk in an extent of 27 cents as the proceedings initiated by the second respondent has abated in view of the Repealing Act 20/1999.
4. W.P.No.11627 of 2004 :
The necessary facts which are to be noticed, in so http://www.judis.nic.in far as this writ petition, for the disposal of the same are as follows :5
(i) That the landed property in S.No.503/2 at Paruthipattu village, Sriperumbutur Taluk, to an extent of 1.07 acres was purchased by the petitioner's father, one Natesa Naicker sometime in 1942. The said Natesa Naicker was having 4 sons by name, (1) Punniyakodi (2) Krishnan (3) Srinivasan and (4) Govindaraj, the petitioner in this writ petition.
5. W.P.No.15563 of 2004 :
The necessary facts which are to be noticed for the disposal of this writ petition are as follows :
(i) The first petitioner herein was one of the four brothers as referred to in the other case. Therefore by virtue of the partition, dated 04.07.1979, the first petitioner inherited 27 cents of land at S.No.503/2, Paruthipattu village, Sriperumbutur Taluk, which was allotted to him by virtue of the said partition.