Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: unsigned document in Gopal Chandra Agarwal And (2) Ors. vs State Of U.P.Through Secy Home ... on 15 April, 2013Matching Fragments
20. The factual matrix of this case as perceived by this Court, stands mainly on the allegation of theft committed by petitioners of signed cheques, signed and unsigned documents belonging to O.P.No.4 and its Company. These cheques and documents were said to have been fabricated and forged with mala fide intention by the accused persons to cause economic loss to O.P.No.4 and his Company. From the perusal of FIR it appears that the alleged theft was committed by accused persons from the office of the Company of O.P. No.4. Admittedly no date and time of alleged theft has been disclosed nor it was shown whether any person witnessed the incident of theft. From the perusal of record of trial court it is clear that nothing was recovered from the possession of accused/petitioner during investigation, as no recovery memo of any documents or cheques said to have been stolen, was placed on record.