Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

1. On 10.9.1988 Duty Officer of PS Timarpur received a PCR message at 8:30AM that in a pond close to Nirankari Colony , a dead body is lying. Upon receiving this message , SHO Inspector D. N. Kaushik alongwith staff reached the spot. There he found dead body of a human being lying in a sack in decomposed condition. The body was got photographed and FIR U/s 302 IPC was got registered. During this process SI Dalel Singh of PS R.K. Puram two reached there alongwith one Jagdev Singh who was complainant of FIR No.275/99 U/s 365 IPC, PS R.K. Puram. Jagdev Singh identified the body to be of his son Om Kumar while stating that his son and his son's wife Smt. Anita left for Anita's parental House at Village Kanonda, Bahadurgarh, Delhi to celebrate Rakhi on 27.08.88, but did not return back. He stated that on 03.09.88 he had lodged a missing complaint with PP Vinay Nagar, PS R.K. Puram. At the spot SHO, Timarpur seized the articles found at the spot including the jute sack, jute rope, bunch of hairs, pond water and earth. He also seized underwear of deceased apart from that of his father Jagdev Singh as they were similar and sent the body for post mortem apart from recording statements.

2. During further investigation it was revealed that Jagdev Singh, father of deceased, had lodged a written complaint with SHO PS R.K. Puram on Contd/.........

/3/ 07.09.88. In his typed complaint Jagdev Singh father of the deceased told the police that his son Om Kumar had left for Delhi on 28.08.88 itself. He disclosed the name of one DTC bus conductor Hari Singh who is said to have told him that he knew his son Om Kumar and that Om Kumar and his wife Anita had boarded DTC Bus Root No. 631 from Punjabi Bagh wherein he was bus conductor. There in the bus Anita was talking to one boy to which Om Kumar objected as that boy was following them from Bahadurgarh, Haryana. Anita is said to have claimed that boy is her relative. As per Complaint Anita , Om Kumar and two boys alighted the bus at R.K. Puram Red Light.

/22/ Singh identified the body from the underwear. At the instance of Jagdev Singh underwear was seized and jute rope was also seized. He recorded statement of Jagdev Singh, Dalip Kumar and SI Dalel Singh. He was handed over copy of documents by IO of PS R.K. Puram, whereby they came to know that Anita is in judicial custody in connected FIR No.365/88 of PS R.K. Puram. On 12.9.88, he formally arrested Anita after issuance of production warrants. He took her police custody remand and recorded 2nd disclosure statement Ex. PW36/C. She allegedly led the police party to CRPF 2nd Btln of Ravinder Rangshala, Mandir Marg, Delhi. There he seized the kit of accused Narender. She is also shown to have pointed out the shop of PW1 Babu Ram where they allegedly consumed cold drink. She led the police party to Rajkot on 14.9.88. Although it is located in Ludhiana, Punjab but as per this witness it is in Haryana. She is said to have pointed out the room where she allegedly lived with Narender for few days. Vide his application Ex. PW36/E, PW36 seized the leave record of accused Narender apart from seizing his clothes. Accused Narender was arrested and brought to Delhi on 15.9.88. Separate disclosure of accused Narender was recorded Ex. PW36/F. Fresh pointing out memo of the alleged place of murder and the place where the body was thrown after murder by keeping in the jute bag was prepared Ex. PW36/H. On 17.9.88 he got a message that accused Surender is Contd/.........

/34/ bus route No.631 that had destination of R.K. Puram. As per the deposition of PW2 Hari Singh who was the conductor of this bus, he knew Om Kumar @ Ramu. He said that Ramu was accompanied by a lady and a boy at around 12.00 in the noon. As per him accused Anitta was that lady and accused Narender was that boy who boaded the bus. He stated that since Anita & Narender were talking to each other, Ramu objected to it and gave her a fist blow on abdomen. He further stated that when the route of the bus ended at R.K. Puram all three of them alighted the bus. This sighting of accused, as per the prosecution case was apparently the third last sighting. This version, as putforth by PW2, was infested with several significant improvement / contradictions. As discussed (supra) he improved on the fact that accused Narender boarded the bus alongwith Ramu and Anita whereas it was not part of his statement given to the police Ex. PW2/A. He also improved when he claimed that Narender claimed to be the cousin of Anita whereas his 161 Cr.P. C statement is silent on it. There is contradiction qua the alleged assault by Om Kumar upon Anita when he said that Om Kumar gave fist blow to Anita on her abdomen while earlier it is said that she was just kicked. Another important contradictory fact which has come on record is that this witness denied his acquaintance with PW6 Jagdev where as as per PW6, it was PW2 Hari Singh. Jagdev was his acquaintance who disclosed him about this sighting. On the contrary as per PW2 Hari Singh , the only person with Contd/.........