Skip to main content
Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
"Primarily, the grievance raised by the petitioner
before this Court is that no external development works had
been carried out by the respondents at the site and as such
the petitioner was not liable to pay the aforesaid
development charges, and in any case, the aforesaid policy
decision was not even applicable to the case of the
petitioner.
Shri R.S. Mittal, learned Senior counsel appearing
for the petitioner, however, argues that since the appellate
MOHD YAKUB
2023.08.09 16:24
I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of
this document
Punjab and Haryana High Court,
Chandigarh.
2023:PHHC:102842
authority has remanded the matter back to the competent
authority with some definite directions, therefore, the
competent authority would be legally bound by such
directions and various pleas raised by the petitioner
challenging levy of the external development charges,
remain adjudicated.
Keeping in view of the fact and circumstances of the
case and also the fact that the appellate authority has
already set aside the original demand orders passed against
the petitioner and the matter has been remanded back to the
competent authority for re-determination, we deem it
appropriate to direct the competent authority to adjudicate
upon the various objections/pleas raised by the petitioner
challenging the levy of the external development charges.
For the aforesaid purpose, the competent authority
would adjudicate upon the various pleas/objections,
wherein it has been pointed out that no external
development work had been carried out by the respondents.
It would be only after the determination of the aforesaid
fact that the competent authority would be required to pass
a fresh demand order against the petitioner, if any. On
passing of the aforesaid fresh demand order, the petitioner
would be at liberty to challenge the same, if so advised, in
accordance with law. Till the final determination is made by
the competent authority, the petitioner would not be
required to pay/deposit any external development charges.