Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

3. Briefly stated, prosecution version was that one Ms. 'H', the  victim,   aged   about   19   years   was   married   to   PW­2,  Kishanbhai   Aalabhai   Parmar.   She   suffered  from    chronic  stomachache.   Despite   medical   treatment,   there   was   no  relief.   The   accused   claimed   to   be   a   'Bhuva"   (a   tantrik;   a  person   knowing   black   magic   and   one   who   would   use   it  normally   for   curing   people   of   incurable   mental   and  physical   ailments).   He   had   come   to   visit   a  temple   in   the  R/CR.A/828/2007 JUDGMENT village   where   the   victim   was   living   with   her   in­laws.   Her  mother­in­law coming to know about his professed powers,  called   him   to   cure   the   victim.   He   performed   a   brief  ceremony and assured that within few weeks, the pain will  subside. Coincidentally, after this incident pain also eased  upon which the family of the victim called the accused for  performing puja. He came to their house on 14.5.2006. In  the evening, after having dinner, he started the ceremony  inside the house. After couple of hours of making a show of  performing  puja,   he   asked  all  the  family  members  of  the  victim,   except   her,   to   leave   the   room   so   that   he   can  complete  rest of the  ceremony.  Her family members  went  out. After some time the accused asked them to shut the  door to provide complete privacy. Some 10 to 15 minutes  later,  members  of the family got suspicious.  They  rushed  into   the   room   to   find   the   victim   as   well   as   the   accused  completely   naked   and   accused   having   sexual   intercourse  with her. The accused escaped from there and an FIR was  later on lodged by the victim.

4. Kishanbhai   Aalabhai   Parmar,   PW­2,   exh.19,   husband   of  the   victim,   deposed   that   he   lived   in   village   Javranti     in  Radhanpur  Taluka. His wife was from Ahmedabad. He had  got   married   two   years   back.   She   used   to   complain   of  stomachache. Despite medical treatment, her condition did  not   improve.   Accused   who   had   come   to   the   village   for  visiting   the   temple   was   a   'Bhuva'.   The   mother   therefore,  met   him   and   spoke   to   him   about   the   complaint   of   the  victim. He performed a brief ceremony and promised  that  the pain will disappear in 21 days, after which, rest of the  ceremony   would   have   to   be   performed.   Since   after   this  R/CR.A/828/2007 JUDGMENT incident,     pain   subsided,   they   called   him   to   perform   the  remaining  ceremony.  He came  at about  6 O' clock  in the  evening.  Relatives  had  also  come.  They  all  had  dinner  in  the evening. The accused started the ceremony at about 10  O' clock at night. He sat on a cot inside the room with his  wife  sitting  opposite  him.  He  and  all  other  relatives   were  present. Accused spent time on ceremony for about two to  three hours. At 1:30, he declared that looking to the cause  of   the   pain,   he   would   have   to   perform   black   magic   for  which he asked all the family members  to sit outside the  house.   To   get   rid   of   wife's   trouble   permanently,   they   all  went out. The door of the house was kept open. He closed  the   door   upon   the   accused   complaining   about   the  disturbance. Some 10 to 15 minutes later, he opened the  door   to   find   his   wife   and   accused   both   naked   and   the  accused was having intercourse with the victim. He pulled  him but the accused escaped and ran away. His wife told  him that the accused had told her that if she did not allow  him to have intercourse, her pain would not go away. Out  of   fear   and   unwillingly,   she   had   participated   in   the  intercourse.   To   avoid   adverse   publicity,   they   did   not  complaint immediately. 

  In the cross examination, he agreed that the door was  not  locked.  It was  merely  left  ajar.    He  knew  that  before  marriage, his wife had a love affair with a boy living near  her  house.  His  wife  had  told  him that  since  she  married  him, this boy was using black magic to harass her because  of which she was having pain in her abdomen. He admitted  that   after   the   said   incident,   the   victim   was   sent   to   her  parents house and he never brought her back. 

17. The only question is that of the consent of the victim.  For multiple reasons, such claim of consensus act must be  discarded.   Firstly,   no   such   suggestion   was   made   by   the  defence at any stage of the trial. Secondly, the victim was  aged barely 19 years of age. The accused was aged about  36   years.   They   had   no   previous   meeting,   contact   or  relations leading to any possibility of closeness. The victim  would be taking an extreme risk consenting to such an act  in   close   proximity   of   her   husband   and   several   other  relatives sitting just outside the room which was 10 ft x 10  ft in area. The evidence strongly suggests that victim and  other   family   members   were   prone   to   easily   influence   by  persons claiming tantrik or special powers of black magic.  The victim herself had disclosed to her husband that before  marriage, she had affair with a boy in her neighbourhood.  It was possible that since she married Kishanbhai, he was  using  black  magic to harass  her. The victim also pointed  out   that   her   husband   had   called   'Bhuva'   on   numerous  occasion to cure  all her ills. She was thus a young girl who  could   be   influenced   or   impressed   by   a   relatively   elderly  R/CR.A/828/2007 JUDGMENT person claiming to possess such super natural powers. The  manner   in   which   the   incident   took   place,   her   condition  soon after the accused was caught red handed committing  crime, would suggest she was left in almost a trance at the  time when the accused committed sexual intercourse with  her   and   was  thus   deprived  of   any  power  of   reasoning  or  judgement.   The   fact   that   she   did   not   put   up   physical  resistance would be wholly irrelevant. Clearly it was a case  of sexual intercourse without consent.