Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

13. None of the witness has explained about the price mentioned, as noticed above. Interestingly, Sundar Lal (DW-3) stated that at the time of entering into agreement, crop of 'Sarsu' and 'Arhar' (i.e. mustard) was standing which is a 'Ravi' crop and is not harvested in the month of September when the alleged agreement dated 25/09/1973 (Exhibit-A-4) was said to have been executed while the plaintiff has deposed that the crop of mustered (6 of 11) [SAC-46/2002] and 'Chana' was there at the time of entering into agreement dated 27/02/1974. Therefore, the circumstance whether the agreement was entered into on 25/09/1973 is doubtful; the court is in agreement with and concurs with the findings of the Courts i.e. the trial court and the Single Bench (that the agreement (Exhibit-A-4) was backdated and prepared subsequently) to create evidence and counter the plaintiffs claim for specific performance of the agreement Exhibit-A-1 dt.27/02/1974.